Russia is rich in land, forests, and fields. A dignified poor feels very enthusiastic with a bare a*s. Do you understand what 12,000 rubles is? The idea that if we take it all away and divide it, something will happen – nothing will happen

Except for ashes and dust – it’ll go up in smoke. Remember how the kulaks were dispossessed? Next came Stalin, then the people’s wealth used to be divided. It makes no difference whether you’re poor or rich. Whoever is strongest is right. I’m ending my YouTube broadcasting, I won’t make videos any more.

Listen to the new track here CHANNEL No.1 ABOUT MONEY AND BUSINESS – Igor, today I want to talk about you, about rich people. – Oh, yeah? Are there a lot of us? I’m supposed to be the only one. – No, there aren’t many, and I see a growing resentment

Among the less wealthy toward the rich. There’ve been so many comments on one of our recent videos that said, “The rich are living off, we should take it all away and divide it, it’s all their fault.” Why is the poor’s hatred of the rich

So quick to manifest itself? That is, as soon as something like a crisis happens, we hear things like, “Take away, divide, bourgeois, oligarchs,” once again? – There’re three points here. The first point is very strong: Russia is one of the countries with the biggest gap

Between the poor and the rich. There’re people who spend in one day what other people earn in a year, and when a normal person sees this, what kind of condition can they have? Secondly, okay, you’re poor for now, but when you see some prospects,

When you see the horizon coming, you’re ready to work hard, and you’ll make it, but here comes the second reason: people don’t see any prospects, people don’t see the horizon, and therefore there is a fear that you’re poor, you’re in need, and it’ll always be that way.

And this is where all sorts of suicidal thoughts come in, and so on, “Why live like this? Why does it happen to me? Is that the meaning of life – to endure, to suffer, to be worn out?” Here is the second reason: no prospects, no horizon, hopelessness.

And so this state becomes absolutely all-encompassing, permanent, enveloping completely, as if you were concreted in a slab and you were like… The third reason is the lack of agency, that is, people feel like cogs, waiting for an order, a command,

And when they feel bad, they keep waiting for someone’s command, someone’s kick, they don’t initiate active ways out of this state, no, they just wait. When a person waits, they subconsciously look at everything around them and see the reasons for feeling bad

In someone or something. Who is keeping me from living a rich and dignified life? Biden, who else, Macron, Putin, who else is there? Someone is stopping me, keeping me down, holding me back. I don’t make decisions, I’m an eternal waiter, I wait to be told

What to do, and I’m angry that I feel bad, and I wait for someone to make me feel good, but I only get worse, and that’s the third reason. These three reasons feed on each other: you’re poor and therefore lack agency;

You lack agency and therefore you’re so dependent and poor. That’s the loop, and what prospects does it offer? There is only one prospect: eating a dog’s dinner. And the fact that these reasons feed on one another sets a person in a vicious circle

From which there is no escape. But there is a way out. Watch this video to the end and find ways to break out of this vicious circle. – Could it be that rich people are really to blame

For the fact that people in Russia are getting poorer, or at least not getting richer? – First of all yes, the facts are there: Yeltsin’s Perestroika and so on, pledge stocks, by the way, like “Let’s give away the people’s wealth now.”

They did, and as a result, all the people’s wealth ended up in the hands of the party establishment. However, I want to note that there are a lot of rich people who are self-made, for example Galitsky, TechnoNICOL, me and Sergey Kolesnikov.

And I would suggest that we stop dragging this story about the 90s. Now the majority of entrepreneurs, the young ones, who were knee-high to a frog in the 90s or weren’t even born yet, for example the Bukhman brothers, Soloviev from Skyeng and so on.

But once again I’ll go back to the beginning and agree with the fact that there’re fair points: after all, rich people are responsible for the way people or society as a whole live, and here rich people don’t fulfil or express this responsibility in specific actions

To improve the welfare of the whole people, the whole society, or in any case to make their activities visible in this regard. How could these activities be expressed? Funding boarding schools, that is, building private schools and providing tuition-free places in these schools

For people who, for example, are gifted but can’t afford it. You know, building hospitals and, again, providing places for those who can’t afford it. That’s what most established entrepreneurs do in Germany, for example, and that’s quite normal for German entrepreneurs. You’re weird

If you don’t engage in schools, if you don’t grant gifted kids. In Russia, it’s the other way around: you’re weird if you build private schools. Many people say, “Rybakov, you’re weird for building private schools and kindergartens.” I agree. I’d like to have more weird entrepreneurs like Rybakov

In Russia. Then the people’s life, the lives of ordinary citizens would be much better. – You mentioned social projects that entrepreneurs should be doing, but let’s talk directly about business. Entrepreneurs often underpay people and keep them on very low salaries, especially in the province,

Where people have nowhere to go. What can be done about it? You can build a school, but still pay 15,000 rubles to your factory workers. – Yes, this is a bane, and it freaks me out that some entrepreneurs aggressively go and take advantage

Of the so-called “middle labor market”, but the labor market in Russia is set by the state-owned companies. In our country, about 70% is the public sector. These are budgetary jobs, these are various social enterprises, and these are corporations with a high share of government participation.

So just imagine, 70% of the jobs are rationed and set by the public sector or near-public sector, which is a benchmark, a reference mark for salaries in any private company. Private companies simply pay like state companies plus 5-10% at most.

And if an entrepreneur, a businessperson overpaid salaries by, say, two or three times, which they could theoretically do, what would all this lead to? To an increase in the prime cost of goods and services that this entrepreneur arranges or produces. Who would buy

A pie that is twice as expensive if there’s a pie that is twice as cheap? Would you buy such a pie? No. As a result, this entrepreneur, this businessperson would go bankrupt, and everything would perish. In fact, the situation here is this:

Every private entrepreneur will have to pay, as I always say, a minimum of 100,000 rubles to their employee, a minimum of 100,000, the goal is 200,000, only in one case: when the State sets a minimum salary of 100,000 rubles in all social enterprises,

In all private-public sector enterprises and so on. Then everything will be easy, you know? Then there would be support from below, the level of support. But as long as the minimum salary in Russia is 13,000 rubles… I understand that this isn’t the minimum salary

That people have to be paid, but it was introduced as a statistical figure to calculate some kind of norms and ratios, I understand that, but the effect of this figure on the minimum salary is very strong. Can you imagine a hospital attendant earning 12,000 rubles?

Do you understand what 12,000 rubles is? So no matter what we say here, no entrepreneur will set a salary of 100,000 rubles when it’s 12,000 here, do you understand what the difference is? The age of such altruists is short-lived. A law

Should be passed in Russia – a law on respect for human labor – and it should be called “law on respect for human labor”. You hire a person, it doesn’t matter who they are – a guest worker who came from somewhere, an immigrant, a Russian – it doesn’t matter.

You hire a person, so pay a minimum of 100,000 rubles and set up an efficient job or hire a goddamn robot, okay? Then there will be respect for human labor. What kind of respect do we have now? And all this buzz

That we don’t have enough money and so on – of course you don’t, I have no idea how to live on 12,000 rubles. I don’t know where people get their food for that 12,000. So that’s how we live, geez, so what, do you like this life,

When we live like this? I don’t really like it, that’s why it’s better to pay people at least 100,000, and the goal is 200,000. And after all, these people, when they earn 100-200 thousand, will go to cafes, do expensive shopping, and they’ll buy

Goods and services and so on, and here is the market for creating quality products. Otherwise, try finding at least some quality stuff that isn’t imported from China. Twice hell! Except for mittens, bast shoes and pies, there is nothing and will never be,

Because the Russian consumer can afford only mittens and bast shoes. – I want to get back to the take-and-divide statement, after all. It’s very common now, in the comments as well, and people say that the system in the Soviet Union was fairer: people weren’t very rich,

And on average, everybody lived pretty well. Maybe this take-and-divide approach is a solution for Russia, after all? – First, I want to say about the Soviet Union: in the Soviet Union, there were no statistics about how the party establishment lived. They lived very well, very high:

Cars, trips, etc., but the statistics just didn’t take that into account, and it was kind of drawn to prove that the gap between the rich and the poor in the Soviet Union was about fourfold. The “land of justice”, but there were a lot of unaccounted things –

Benefits, barters that the party establishment enjoyed, etc. Let’s move to this take-and-divide thing nowadays. Basically, Russia is a very poor country. Paradoxically, we’re kind of rich in forests, fields, oil, gas – well, those are fairy tales. Look at small Qatar: it’s much richer per square meter of area

Or per inhabitant than Russia. Russia is gigantic in territory; if all these riches are divided by square meters, well, we can’t even build roads; we’ve been building the Moscow–Saint Petersburg motorway for 30 years, and it’ll be a toll road – the great country

Failed to find money for Moscow–Saint Petersburg motorway, so it’ll be a toll one – we couldn’t afford it. Next is the mythology that came to us from the Soviet Union, when we used to be fobbed off with fables that Russia was rich in land, forests, fields…

Guys, that’s a myth. It was all done so that the Soviet people feel bare-a*sed but very dignified – such dignified paupers. The dignified poor, and they don’t show off, they don’t ask unnecessary questions. Why? Because they know for themselves that they live freaking awesome in a rich country.

Can a citizen of a rich country be poor? No. So shut your mouth, even if you feel bare-a*sed and you feel something is humming – you’ve got it all wrong. It’s right to feel good and dignified. A dignified pauper feels very enthusiastic with a bare a*s. So, as I said,

If we divide the welfare that the country sort of has by square meters, we’ll be left with such a small piece, and if you divide it by people, what will be left is just crumbs. So, the theory that if we take it all away and divide it,

Something will happen – nothing will happen except for ashes and dust – it’ll go up in smoke. Okay, there might be fireworks once, you come to the square, have fun and then get back to this gray everyday life, to nothing – it’s all that’s going to happen. And the second one,

And that’s important, and maybe even more important: the point is that the take-and-divide traditions, I say it again, are very, very tenacious in Russia. Remember from the history books, from the movies and so on how the kulaks were dispossessed? And then Stalin used to find

Those “werewolves”, or someone, those saboteurs and send them off to labor camps, then the people’s wealth used to be divided at loans-for-shares auctions for vouchers which would be bought up. By the way, I also invested my voucher in an investment company. Where is this investment company?

I don’t know. I remember investing in Rinako, and I realized that they were just mocking and screwing people. All that shuffling, thimble-riggers at the train stations, you know? Whizzing around, Rinako, give me your voucher, you gave it away, that’s it. So, as for the question of when someday you’ll get a piece

Of what was taken away from someone else – they’ll find your surplus in the next cycle, they’ll tell you you’re in clover or they’ll shear you, and you’ll end up in this tradition, because to every action, there’s an opposite equal reaction. All that determination with which we act

Towards others comes as a backlash. That’s why you’ll end up seeing that someone will come and redivide what you have, and you’ll say, “What’s there to divide? I have nothing.” “No problem, give me the boots, you’re wearing boots.” “ But I have only one pair.”

“That’s okay, you do have one pair, a whole pair, so give it.” So, it makes no difference whether you’re poor or rich – as soon as you let the take-and-divide genie out of the jug, a totally different story starts up at once, and the story to start up will be this:

Whoever is strongest is right. And since you’ll get old someday anyway, or someday you’ll become weaker, you’ll be sheared, too, as the saying goes, it will happen to you too, just wait for it. And let me suggest an option that might work for all of us and also seems fair:

Multiplying what we have by 10 366 00:16:32,040 –> 00:16:35,639 to make the pie bigger, and the responsibility for this still ought to be taken by rich people, by the elites. The elite are not the ones who stole the money and left, no. The elite are the ones who develop the country,

Build schools and factories – this is about the elite, because elites always take the responsibility for the development of society, for the development of the people in all societies, that’s right. – Nevertheless, not liking the rich or even hating them is a tradition in Russia. How can we change it?

Is it possible to make the rich be loved? – Yes, we can make the rich be loved. When people stop being poor, they start liking themselves, I mean, loving themselves, that’s it. There’s a way, and there’s only one way: when a person becomes rich,

When they grow rich, they love themselves. All these compensatory measures, clarifications and so on – poor people will always hate the rich, because it’s not that the poor hate the rich – they hate their poverty. They don’t like it, and they live disliking their poverty.

At the same time, rich people just create a contrasting field in which the former get very angry, annoyed, resentful, or irate, they express their dislike and unhappiness in relation to their poverty, dislike of that state. The only way to change this is to make sure that people grow rich.

So, one way is to strain after having more rich people in Russia. I stress that we have all the preconditions for that. A dignified poor is a dignified rich-to-be. Let’s consider some examples now: probably there are people on my channel who used to live very poorly,

Extremely poorly, and by the way, I myself used to live very poorly: we had a family that was very poor, though we were engineers, but we lived planting two plots of potatoes, and it was only enough to feed the family, and then life changed and became richer,

Maybe we even joined the middle class. Write down how your attitude toward wealth has changed, and then, when you grew rich or started to live well off, what your attitude was at this point – not toward them, but toward yourself. – You say we have to increase the pie tenfold,

That sounds very cool, but let’s talk about how to do it in practice. What does it take to make it grow like that? – Yeah, okay. The first thing is to change the attitude toward business. Now the grassroots attitude toward business is this: businesspeople, or entrepreneurs

Profit off of someone. That kind of attitude basically keeps a lot of our kids, adults-to-be, away from business. I think there can be only one attitude: entrepreneurs are those who make useful products or services for others, and indeed they’re almost like gods. If these gods stop creating

These products, our lives will turn into a subsistence economy again – we’ll live in the countryside and lose our brightside. Everyone says, “I want to go to the village, it’s nice there.” I’ll tell you what: guys, when was the last time you were in the village? Manure, all that stuff,

Outdoor toilets and so on. Go to the countryside, connect with it, okay? A village is where you heat the stove by yourself, take out manure, barely stomp down this muddy road, one you can’t get through and so on. Do you want to go to the countryside now?

Go ahead, but I don’t want to, I’d rather prefer city life. Point two: many people keep living in the past – there’s such a tradition. The word ‘tradition’ itself contains this cultural code: people don’t accept the situation that we don’t have a State or society

That has proclaimed this “from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs”. It was all a utopian illusion – communism and so on. The Soviet Union never lived like that but declared that it aspired to, and it even set up such enclaves somewhere – showpiece collective farms,

An exhibition of the national economy achievements. You know, there was everything at such an exhibition, but when you came to this collective farm, there wasn’t a damn thing there. That was a fake, a dream. Now, a lot of people have absorbed this dream and the so-called “charge of hope”.

This charge of hope isn’t about faith in the future, no, it’s a kind of fanaticism, the bigotry with which you acknowledge the reality in no way, you ignore it. Accept the reality before you start dying, before your arms and legs grow numb. The pain you feel

Is the way the universe tells you things could be different here. The universe has no other language to inform you but pain. That’s point two: recognition. Recognition of the fact that the way we live our lives doesn’t suit us. This second point is very important. The next point

Will be about how to neutralize poverty, keep it from spreading and taking over everything, and therefore the third point is a minimum salary of 100,000 rubles: we just have to make sure we don’t have extremely poor people, that’s it. The point is that a person who lives in poverty

Creates a field of logical reasons where their children, or neighbors model such a pattern of life as acceptable, you know? That’s why we need to get rid of endless reproduction of poverty as a norm of living at the architectural level, and those businesspeople, entrepreneurs and organizers

Of all sorts of jobs that can’t set up a business or manufacture products with the right prime cost ensuring jobs at 100,000 rubles will leave the market. Fourth, a law and departmental and any other regulations that are necessary to implement should be passed

So that poor people don’t get even poorer. The point is that a poor person has zero financial literacy, and so they get into the debt loop, and then they can’t get out of it. Now, the suggestion is very simple: if a microfinance institution, a bank or some kind of a profiteer

Grants a loan at a rate over 18%, let them pay everything above 18% by themselves, that’s it. The law is simple: you grant it – you pay for it, got it? Otherwise, we treat one side and cripple the other,

And then we cure and cripple again. What do we do? We just bullsh*t. Fifth, and I really like this point, perhaps some of you will latch on this, or tell your friends, acquaintances, your children about it, make sure you tell them. The fifth point is about social elevators: we need more social elevators

To get out of these loops of poverty. Indeed, there’re 30 million people who don’t have access to a quality education, you know? I’m not talking about medicine, I’m talking about education as the only way to get out of the loops of poverty, for example. Here are boarding schools,

Here are people who take care of and grant a scholarship for someone who endeavors, and the latter gets a ticket to life, as well as commitment: when everything happens in their life, they ought to pull at least one person up with them as well. So, the chain

Of student succession activates these social elevators that are already working in multitudes. The more people get a ticket to life, The more people will give a ticket to life to others afterwards. It’s a cumulative effect, a quantum effect; if you’ve been pulled out,

Go right now and pull out the one who aspires, give them that elevator, that’s it. – Before all you’ve told us about happens, let’s make some recommendations to a particular person who is currently living in this very extreme poverty, or just poverty. What are they supposed to do?

But we’d also like to give a kind of warning: there’s a fair amount of people who have a lot of money, or middle-income people, who say, “Get up and go, just do it, just leave for somewhere,” but it’s almost impossible for a poor person: there’re no financial resources,

No moral resources to do so. – Absolutely. I’m strongly opposed to those people who say, “Get up and go, come on.” It all leads to injuries. First of all, all these speeches don’t work for those who are in this poverty loop to the fullest,

“Get up and go, come on, go for broke, mortgage your apartment,” putting all the eggs in one basket, etc. Where are those who have already done that? In an asylum, or they’re dead or traumatized and barely crawled away and so on.

So, it’s not just that I don’t recommend it – I forbid you to do that. What should one do in this situation? My recipe, and it’s not even a recipe, but a fork, is this: first, you can acknowledge a drop at this point, to acknowledge and run off, to say,

“That’s not about us – that’s how life is,” and start looking for a way to settle down on the bottom, where it’s very uncomfortable, where everything hurts and so on, but taking some painkillers from time to time, distracting you mind and activating the living-out age. Second option: say no

And keep looking for an option, “I’ll keep looking for my people, people near whom I’ll feel my superior manifestation, where I’ll like what’s happening to me, I’ll keep looking for it.” You see, the key words are “I’ll keep”. Rybakov’s recipe

Is to disagree with the state where you don’t like what’s happening to you and keep looking for combinations or people that make you like what’s happening to you, okay? And lastly, I’d like to tell you a very important thing: to start with your body, mind and heart

Is the most important thing. You are the chief of your life, you’re the main project of your life. By starting with ourselves, we prepare ourselves for the blossoming gardens around us, in the street where we live, in our town, in our country and so on. If you’ve watched

This video now and strongly said no, you don’t agree, but you didn’t start with yourself, with your body, mind and heart at once but with some international problems, you opened Telegram again, RBC, TV, YouTube, and so on, you’re distracted again. How can Biden or Putin help or hinder you?

They’ll have an effect on you, however, if you get distracted by them: you’ll screw up your life again. The way you’ll feel will depend on how you turn on your body, mind and heart, and then the family, and then the street where you live,

And then the country – it’ll all add up, but start with yourself. When on board the plane, you’re told to put your mask on first, and then to put a mask on someone else – a friend, a neighbor, etc., so put it on yourself. We start with ourselves, guys.

Frankly speaking, even this video distracts you from yourselves. I’m ending my YouTube broadcasting, I won’t make videos any more, I’ve made so many, I’ve made too many of them, look at how many of Rybakov’s videos are on YouTube, I think they’re already everywhere on VK,

Rybakov is everywhere, he’s discerned everywhere; wherever I go, I just get this, there’s probably some SEO that targets me and is like, “Rybakov, look, here’s Rybakov,” and I’m like, “What do I need Rybakov for?” Anyway, I’m ending my YouTube broadcasting with the words: Good-bye! We’ll be multiplying good things together,

So that there’s no room left for anything bad, but we’ll be doing it anywhere but on YouTube. The new album RYBAKOV CODE Listen here

рыбаков,бизнес,игорь рыбаков,деньги,саморазвитие,предприниматель,личностный рост,рыбаков игорь,мысли миллиардера,мотивация,россия,заработок,экономика,как стать богатым,успех,финансы,как стать успешным,нищета,нищета в россии,успешный бизнес,бедность,психология бедности,бизнес в россии,жизнь в россии,бедность в россии,богатые должны отдать деньги,богатые должны отдать деньги народу,почему люди в россии нищие,кто обокрал страну,почему богатые должны отдать деньги